n Compulaw - 1st Indigenous Digital Law Library
Disable Preloader

CaseLaw

RT. Hon Balonwu V. Gov. Anambra State & Ors (2009) CLR 12(J) (SC)

Judgement delivered on December 4th 2009

Brief

  • Subject to – Meaning of in section 105 (3) of the 1999 constitution - - - - - - - - - - -
  • Interpretation of statute
  • House of assembly members Tenure
  • Proclamation issued by Governor
  • Grounds of appeal
  • Section 105(1) of the Constitution
  • Section 138 of the Electoral Act 2002
  • Section 105(3) of the Constitution
  • Section 318(1) of the 1999 Constitution
  • Section 59(c) of the Electoral Act, 2002
  • Section 138(1) of the Electoral Act, 2002
  • Section 184 of the 1999 Constitution.

Facts

The Appellants in this appeal as Plaintiffs had commenced their action by Originating Summons at the High Court of Justice of Anambra State sitting in Awka claiming a number of declaratory reliefs, the principal of which reliefs is on their tenure of office as members of the Anambra State House of Assembly who were elected in the general election conducted for all the Houses of Assembly in Nigeria in May, 2003. The Appellants action was against the Governor of Anambra State and the members of the Anambra State House of Assembly who were elected in the general election conducted for Houses of Assembly in the States of the Federation of Nigeria on 14th April, 2007. The reliefs claimed by the Appellants were based on the undisputed facts or factors surrounding the success of the Anambra State Governor Peter Obi in the election petition dispute between him and Governor Dr. Chris Ngige in the election to the office of the Governor of Anambra State held in 2003. The main ground of the Appellants' claims however was hinged on the interpretation of Section 105(1) and (3) of the 1999 Constitution prescribing the tenure of office of the members of the State House of Assembly.

At the conclusion of the hearing of the action by the trial Court, on the application of the law to the undisputed facts arising from the affidavit in support of the Originating Summons and the counter-affidavit opposing the same, the learned trial Judge in his judgment delivered on 17th September, 2007, refused all the reliefs claimed by the Appellants and dismissed their action.

Dissatisfied with the decision of the trial Court, the Appellants appealed to the Enugu Division of the Court of Appeal which also in a unanimous decision given on 26th June, 2008, dismissed the appeal, hence the present appeal by the Appellants to this Court.

Issues

  • 1
    Did the Appellant's Counsel misquote Justices of the Supreme Court, was...
Read More